Monday, March 08, 2010

Women's Reservation Bill & Socio-Political Policy

A bill proposing 33% reservation for women in India's national parliament and state legislatures was tabled by the ruling Congress Party in the Rajya Sabha (upper house) today. Currently, it is in the process of being stalled in decidedly uncivil ways by those opposed to the bill, some elected representatives of dubious history. For today, I am cheering on the goons. Let me explain why.

My political philosophy is utilitarian. With the assumption of the zeroth law of all modern political philosophy - that political rights to all the governed will be equal - a version of preference utilitarianism comes closest to describing an ideal social objective. Give the people what they want, but don't privilege anyone's wants over anybody else's.

To a first approximation, people want to be rich and productive, to own territory, to be free and yet safe (from the territorial ambitions of others) and to not be very disadvantaged compared to others. 'Sovereignty' best describes the combination of liberty, safety and territory. 'Dignity' best describes the combination of relative and absolute aspects of the egalitarian ideal (nobody should die of starvation, nobody should be *very poor* compared to others). Prosperity, sovereignty, dignity - these are the sometimes conflicting objectives of an ideal social utility or welfare function.

An existing social order or legal status quo may be discriminatory. Women may be discouraged from ever thinking about a business or public career - some of them may be much better at the job than the present incumbents. Talented children of a disadvantaged background may never speak English as well as many urban nincompoops, curtailing their career options as well as national productivity. A legitimate farmer may have been dispossessed of his land to benefit an incapable land-owner two centuries ago by a foreign sovereign that is no longer recognized in the country. These are all impediments not just to the dignity of the people concerned (share of the pie), but also the prosperity of the entire society (size of the pie). Correction of a discriminatory social order can thus be a justified goal of policy for the purpose of both prosperity and dignity. The question is - what needs to be corrected and how best to do it?

Most discriminatory social orders manifest themselves as endowment failures. A policy that attempts to correct such an order while maximizing the combination of prosperity and dignity must aim at removing the relevant endowment failure, setting the equilibrium of the outcomes to be determined freely. Top-down reservations, of the kind embodied in the women's reservation bill, attempt to directly force outcomes - assuming that the endowment failures will then auto-correct. They end up maximizing neither prosperity nor dignity.

The most pervasive endowment failure is being born in poverty. Correcting for that - in the form of transfers and subsidies or economic status based reservations and affirmative action - is the highest RoI policy that one can have. This is a good case to support economic status based policy as opposed to caste based or gender based reservations, but it is not complete. Discriminatory social orders can often lead to significant endowment failures beyond poverty. A poor 'forward caste' student is much more likely to have indirect endowments - wealthy, well-educated, networked relatives or friends - than a poor 'backward caste' student. A poor boy will probably get to study in that good college away from home, a poor girl will be asked to drop out of school.

A case can thus still be made for reservations on the basis of gender or caste. Especially, if the reservation is in the law-making body of a representative democracy, where one can argue that the aim itself is 'representation' and not just efficient law-making. It's not a clinching argument, but it is one worth considering. And one must remember that the correct axis of representation is political aspiration, not any other part of your identity.

This argument thus does not really work for gender. Whatever is your preferred level of governance - the nation, the state, the local administration - geographical proximity is the best proxy we have for maximum shared political interests. Caste is rather strongly correlated with geography in India, but gender is obviously not. The constituencies that are reserved for SC/ST candidates are constituencies that have a significant majority of SC/ST population. That is clearly not the case with men and women. It has been proposed to select the reserved constituencies on a rotational basis, but that simply reduces the incentive to get re-elected (and hence to work in the constituency at all).

The fundamental problem with the endowment and representative aspects of the bill then is two-fold - gender is a good proxy neither for poverty nor for shared political aspirations. Moreover, the extremely top-down nature of the proposed reservations means that the new equilibrium will be a classic case of the somewhat disadvantaged crowding out the very disadvantaged. Most of the women who will get to compete on the reserved tickets will be those that are already politically well-off. Men and women will become more equal, but currently powerful women and currently powerless women will become even more inequal. A similar thing happened with caste based reservations. Top down forcing of outcomes does not level the playing field - it actually degrades the most disadvantaged even further.

And until now, we haven't even considered the fact that just as many women who are not given a shot at a career must be abler than many men who are, many men may be better representatives of the political aspirations (of both men and women) of a reserved constituency than all the women candidates. There is a loss to the dignity of these men, and there is a loss of national prosperity. What is more, just like with caste based reservations, the issue will later become part of the entrenched politically correct 'non-partisan' consensus in the country with no hope of being eased out.

The long term solution to the endowment failure of Indian women is surely a general fall in poverty and a more equal social outlook. That is however a long term outlook. Even in the short term, however, there are many better ways - even within the flawed ambit of quantity reservations - to implement a more equal polity and social order. One of the best ones is to reserve not constituencies but electoral tickets : empower women through a chance at political success, don't assure them of the result.

Reservation of seats in the national and state legislatures is a step that improves dignity of some people (currently powerful women) at the expense of many others (currently powerful men, currently powerless women). The effects on national prosperity are equally questionable. The bill must not pass and some uncivil representatives, abhorrent as they may be, are currently our best hope.

p.s: What confuses me, though, is what is the political benefit that Sonia Gandhi sees from such a move. Even if women were to prefer women over men as their representatives, why will women in a reserved constituency vote for a Congress woman over women from the competing parties? Does Sonia Gandhi really believe that such a policy has net positive social gains and is acting upon that? Is she obsessed with the legacy of her dead husband, who first introduced such a proposal in the parliament? Will Congress gain a significant number of votes by being remembered as the party that empowered women? I highly doubt that.

p.p.s: As I finish writing this, it seems that the goons have succeeded, at least for now. Bravo!

7 comments:

Sumanth said...

The Women's Reservation Bill in current form is undemocratic.

This bill attempts to deny 110 million Indian men the right to contest in elections.

People who tabled the bill should be arrested for attacking democracy.

The German Model of Women's Reservation by political parties is democratic.
In Germany, political parties field 30% women candidates in elections.
If Germany can do it, why can not India?


Women's Organisation calls the bill Undemocratic and wants changes
http://www.petitiononline.com/womenres/petition.html

Anonymous said...

Tiffany's is one of the most well known [U]tiffany jewellery uk[/U] brand names and design houses in the jewelry [B]tiffany uk[/B] business. The quality of service, customer satisfaction and the fine designs offered by [U][B]tiffany co[/U][/B] the company are one of the best in their times. The company is primarily [B][URL=http://www.tiffanysfree.com]tiffany engagement rings[/URL][/B] famous for its superb quality and artisanship.

However, as this amount of beauty and quality comes at [B]tiffany & co[/B] a price, there are many jewelry lovers who are just not able to pay [U][B]tiffany rings[/U][/B] the high price and look for suitable replicas instead. This is the [U][B]tiffany company jewelry[/U][/B] reason there are special [U]tiffany uk][/U] designers that now offer beautifully made Replica Tiffany Jewelry and that too, at a much [B][URL=http://www.tiffanysfree.com]tiffany rings[/URL][/B] lower price.

The Tiffany's is one [B]tiffany jewellery uk[/B] of those brands that actually [B]knockoff tiffany jewelry[/B] mark the onset of a classic style and design on its own. Some of the designs of this [B]tiffany jewellery[/B] brand name have become so common and popular, that they [B]3tiffany & co jewellery[/B] are bound to be copied by artisans all over. These replicas are created either by [U][B]tiffany jewellery[/U][/B] using a mass production technique or by an individual jewelry designer who is striving to [U]tiffany london][/U] make a name for his services and capitalize on the original designs. These [U]tiffany jewellery uk[/U] kinds of procedures have made the replica business [B]pandora bracelets[/B] a very lucrative one, with scores of skilled designers [U]tiffany sets][/U] paying close attention to these designs and producing them effortlessly [U][B]discount tiffany jewelry[/U][/B] with same style and appeal.


It is important for [B]tiffany jewellery uk[/B]genuine jewelry lovers to notice that there are [B][URL=http://www.pandoraforyou.com]pandora beads[/URL][/B] fake designers who can pass off their imitations as genuine [U]pandora bracelet[/U] replica Tiffany jewelry. Before you actually buy jewelry, make sure [U][B]tiffany earrings[/U][/B] there is the mark Tiffany & Co., engraved on the [U][B]pandora beads[/U][/B] piece. By rule, all of replica Tiffany's jewelry carries an identification mark for the benefit of its customers.

Anonymous said...

Tiffany's jewelry is world famous company and if [B][URL=http://www.etiffanystore.com]tiffany bracelets[/URL][/B] you cannot afford the actual jewelry there are a lot of Tiffany inspired jewelry to choose from. While Tiffany's [B]tiffany engagement rings[/B] has produced some more affordable pieces like key chains and money clips [U]pandora beads[/U] for those wanting the elegant pieces without the price tag there are other options. Tiffany produces bracelets, rings, earrings [U][B]tiffany jewelry[/U][/B] and necklaces.

Besides the traditional Tiffany's style, the jewelry [B]tiffany necklaces[/B] comes in the traditional blue box and you can even find Tiffany inspired jewelry that [B][URL=http://www.pandoraforyou.com]pandora bracelet[/URL][/B] reproduces the Tiffany style down to the box. Tiffany jewelry is traditionally sterling [U][B]tiffany necklaces[/U][/B] silver as the Tiffany Company has produced a special blend of silver that is very strong [U]pandora jewellery[/U] and will last.

It is not a direct replica but it is inspired from the Tiffany style so [B][URL=http://www.etiffanystore.com]tiffany jewelry[/URL][/B] many of the pieces are very similar to Tiffany. Some companies [U][B]pandora beads[/U][/B] may even produce direct replicas. The main difference between real Tiffany's jewelry [U]tiffany jewelry[/U] and the inspired version jewelry is the price tag. They are just as beautiful [U][B]tiffany rings[/U][/B] and classic as the real ones but at much more affordable prices. If you aspire for [B]tiffany pendants[/B] a piece of Tiffany's then you should investigate Tiffany inspired jewelry.

This jewelry can be found in many [B]tiffany co[/B] places, in stores and online. You can search the [B]pandora jewelry[/B] internet to discover the companies in your area that provide this type [B]tiffany rings[/B] of jewelry. Their heart pendants are particularly popular. These [U][B]pandora bangles[/U][/B] floating heart pendants come in silver, gold and with crystals. They [U][B]tiffany jewelry[/U][/B] also have the traditional Tiffany's circle of life pendant [U]tiffany charms[/U] that resembles a circle of crystals on a chain.

Anonymous said...

t's such a great site. fabulous, quite stimulating!!!

-------

[url=http://oponymozgowe.pl]Opony Mozgowe[/url]
[url=http://pozycjonowanie.lagata.pl]Pozycjonowanie[/url]

[url=http://seo.seo-katalogi.eu/zdrowie-i-uroda/opony,s,1260.html]opony[/url]

Anonymous said...

Xin chao cac bac, em la thanh vien moi. xin chao moi nguoi

Anonymous said...

Hi, certain me on lisachu

http://psychology.net.ru/talk//profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=275849 www.shadows.thelandofoz.net/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=804

Anonymous said...

Seotons - Entreprise de Creation site internet