tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21956427.post833970612691026244..comments2023-10-05T15:01:01.611+05:30Comments on Of Thought & Action: Ajay Shah confounds meRitwikhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00616694597577112758noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21956427.post-56108445775885438722010-08-18T13:55:26.623+05:302010-08-18T13:55:26.623+05:30i'm new... promise to despatch round more regu...i'm new... promise to despatch round more regularly!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21956427.post-60927160651038367712008-10-14T04:51:00.000+05:302008-10-14T04:51:00.000+05:30ON all the posts on this page, you have criticized...ON all the posts on this page, you have criticized someone or the other...<BR/><BR/>everybody is shit...and I couldnt agree more :) <BR/><BR/>I like the puke guy also... oh...infact both of them... <BR/><BR/>they create good drama!<BR/><BR/>"puke should be as logical or illogical as the post puked on"...hehe<BR/><BR/>the concept of contextual puke looks like modern art!<BR/><BR/>I am amazed...truly...<BR/><BR/>God bless u.... <BR/><BR/>the puker, the puke-washer (for lack of a better phrase), and ritwik priya!Tanuj Solankihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06593893191851771382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21956427.post-24080124651005183742008-10-04T01:20:00.000+05:302008-10-04T01:20:00.000+05:30@avataram:Sorry about the unasked for intervention...@avataram:<BR/><BR/>Sorry about the unasked for intervention but somebody had to tell you this.<BR/><BR/>First of all you haven't puked on anyone. Even though you might think you have, your pukes were so innocuous that it is a leap even to classify them as criticism. You are masterful at conveying drama, weaving tales and writing about literature. You should stick to that.<BR/><BR/>Only Nilu does puking masterfully. <BR/>The others on Maanga should not indulge in this activity.<BR/><BR/>You negate the intent of puking when you explain why you puke. OtherNilu's pukes contain anger. In your case you debate with commenters when they disagree with your pukes. Even worse, you acknowledge that you were wrong when someone points out discrepancies in your logic behind the pukes. You are destroying the essence of puking with your lame ass attempts. <BR/><BR/>Pukes should be devoid of explanation. They should be as logical or illogical as the posts being puked upon. Pukes sit several levels above condescension. They should not be directed towards obvious examples of stupidity. And most important of all there should be no anger/hatred in them. See one cannot be angry at something one is indifferent towards. <BR/><BR/>Please ask Nilu to conduct a Puking 101 class for you before you go about characterising Ritwik's posts as pukes.<BR/><BR/>Ritwik, like many others, genuinely gets agitated at Varma and his inability to take into consideration anything that does not fit his ideological bias. He seems genuinely distressed when the author of the most important policy paper displays a moronic bias. His posts provide an explanation for his irritability. They can never be classified as pukes.<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>@Ritwik: Do blog frequently!Chetanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08860208056406768233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21956427.post-3834552611743088352008-10-02T17:36:00.000+05:302008-10-02T17:36:00.000+05:30Why cant you find your own people to puke on? To p...Why cant you find your own people to puke on? To puke on people Nilu or I have already puked on is too easy.avataramhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08597255929527656007noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21956427.post-51037075759788851662008-10-02T16:31:00.000+05:302008-10-02T16:31:00.000+05:30GARP- FRM? WTF is *that*?GARP- FRM? WTF is *that*?Abihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06790560045313883673noreply@blogger.com